Recently, people have often started talking about "personal effectiveness" in the context of training, coaching and other "-ings". At the same time, personal effectiveness is spoken of as a person's ability to achieve set goals. And as goals, recognition, money, power and other privileges of an active individual of a relatively inert and sluggish mass are considered without ambiguity).
But is this the actual mechanism of success?
In my opinion, it is more correct to correlate personal efficiency not with a person's activity and his qualities (although this is important), but with his usefulness, the ability to give people what they need, and in exchange to receive a reward.
This is how human relations work, this is how economics and business work. You can get what you want only by giving something you want to others. And this is primary in efficiency.
How much is the personal effectiveness of an individual in money? In other words, how much can an individual get from people, society and the state for it? How is it monetized?
Utility, benefits generate a counter cash flow in response. And it is important both the value of the transferred goods and the place in which the cash flow is the person who participated in the creation of these goods and claims the remuneration due to him. Let's consider the options.
Option 1
For most people, the measure of their effectiveness is their salary. A kind of market equivalent to personal efficiency. Like any commodity in the commodity-money market, so does a person in the wage labor market have a price. An employer, public or private, acts as an “intermediary” between people who create goods and people who consume them. The market and statehood determine the efficiency and the number of employers. And each employer in its own way defines and implements the personal effectiveness of employees.
An employee can constantly improve his personal effectiveness: try harder, grow professionally, strive for promotion, or look for a better job. This is reasonable, and it is in this sense that the term "personal effectiveness" is now used.
, , . , -, , . , , . , , , .
2
, . . . .
, . , , , . ( , ).
3
. . , , . , , . - . - .
( ) , , .
. , , . , , 2 .
. , , , . .
« ». - !