High-density Wi-Fi doesn't exist

As a disclaimer: I must warn you that this article is not too technical, but we will undoubtedly talk about 802.11 technology and gears. But mainly - let's talk about density.





I love elementary questions, because they (just like elementary particles) on the way to their own depths lead to infinity. When we come across the phrase "high density Wi-Fi", we just want to ask an additional question - what density are we talking about? What is high density? The answer, as always, is not as straightforward as it might seem.





For example, here are a few definitions that I googled relatively easily.





"High-density Wi-Fi networks (hereinafter referred to as HVD) are understood as a wireless environment with a high concentration of users, where users are connected to a wireless network and intensively work with network services" ( source )





In the previous article, we deduced one of the main rules of Wi-Fi: "While one speaks, the rest are listening." A logical question arises - once at each moment of time only one device transmits, is there a fundamental difference between, roughly speaking, one hundred clients at 1 Mbit / s or one client at 100 Mbit / s, if all the data will still be transferred in turn? What density are we talking about - the density of data transmission in the air?





The following definition:





β€œWhen one client device has less than 1 square meter of area, we can assume that your facility has a high density of Wi-Fi connections” ( source )





How is the distance between clients related to the design features of a Wi-Fi network? Again: will I design the network differently if there is 10 times the distance between clients, but they will transfer 100 times more data?





Another definition:





β€œHigh-density Wi-Fi is a design strategy for large deployments to provide pervasive connectivity to clients when a high number of clients are expected to connect to Access Points within a small space. A location can be classified as high density if more than 30 clients are connecting to an AP "





Or in Russian:





Β«Wi-Fi β€” , . , 30 Β»





 ()





31? , β€” Wi-Fi ? 





- . 2017 -2017 Cisco Wi-Fi Β«, Β» ( , ). β€” . β€” , , Wi-Fi.





: . , , , .





, , : β€” , Wi-Fi , β€” , , β€” , , . Wi-Fi β€” , . , β€” , - .





, , 300 ( IP), Wi-Fi, 802.11n 20 . , Β«72,2 /Β». ( ) 407 , ( 115 ) ( Wi-Fi). , , . 





. , , , Β« Β»: β€” , , , . : ! , , , 72% . , ? .





(Β« - Β») β€” , , , . : CW ; ; Wi-Fi 6 β€” : , Wi-Fi , 25% .





? . !





β€” , Wi-Fi «» . , Wi-Fi Speedtest , , 802.11 , 72,2 /, , β€” , 75% . 





, (, ) . , .  β€” ( β€” ), β€” ( β€” , ). ( ) /. !





Wi-Fi ? Β« , Β» β€” , . Β« Wi-FiΒ» Β« Β» , . . , , !





. β€” Wi-Fi . Wi-Fi, , , Wi-Fi, . . β€” , (, , ).





, High Density Guide , (30, ) β€” , , . 





β€” . , , . , . ?





: !





, . 





  • ( β€” 300 , payload . );





  • Rate limiting , ( 300 72,2 /, Β« , !Β». ?). - !





  • ( ). , ? ;





  • , ( ). MIMO 3x3:3 β€” Wi-Fi, PCI-E ASUS, 4x4:4, ;





  • (retry rate β€” Wi-Fi, ) β€” , . 





? β€” ! : 5 6 / ( 2,4 β€” 1 /, --!). , ( Tx management rate) 24 / 300 76 ! 20% ( ) ! 





, 24 / , . ( )!





, .





: !





  • , β€” . (SSID), (, ): SSID β€” Beacon ! , β€” 1 /? !





  • β€” , , , (, !). , , β€” , ;





  • (broadcast Probe Request) β€” ;





  • β€” , ( , ?);





, . β€” : DHCP- ( ), broadcast… , - β€” !





, β€”





: !





β€” 70% . , 80 β€” 70% , !





?





β€” 802.11n 20 , 300 . β€” 802.11ac 80 , . , β€” ! , , , , , 300-500 / Speedtest β€” , , 80 , , , , ! 





, , , . , β€” , , , -.





, Wi-Fi , β€” . , . 40 2,4 :





:





And it probably won't be better. At least until 6E - but this, as Kanevsky says, is a completely different story. In the meantime, your home Wi-Fi has the same density as the office one, it just doesn't know about it yet . You need to know yourself - and better in advance!








All Articles