We live in an amazing time - everyone becomes an expert by reading a couple of articles from the internet. There are, of course, areas of life in which we have always been experts, long before the advent of the worldwide network. For example, football, hockey, relationships and country management.
But now we have additionally mastered specialties that require specific knowledge. For example, medicine. Google to help - and so we correct the doctors, diagnose ourselves and prescribe treatment. And only when it is already very bad, when the rooster continuously begins to peck at the place where the back loses its noble name, do we run to the doctor who has to not only treat a neglected disease, but also fight the consequences of our Internet treatment.
The situation is similar with taxes. The Internet is replete with all sorts of advice on how and what to do during a tax audit, very often directly contradicting each other.
Someone advises to immediately turn on the video camera and dictaphone, someone suggests allocating an office with a kettle, microwave oven and a filled refrigerator. Some offer to keep oral communication to a minimum, others give advice on how to win over, in the style of "call by name more often", "give compliments, but do not flatter", "ask for advice for the future." Some tips are too general, others are too specific, and some are generally dangerous and can lead to negative and unpredictable consequences.
Feeling a desire to bring knowledge to the masses and sincerely worrying about the tax health of our fellow citizens, we carefully analyzed the available information on tax audits, and also summarized our 10-year experience in supporting tax audits.
Our task is to determine specific rules of behavior, an algorithm of actions of the taxpayer, the result of which will be the minimization of possible additional charges.
Pay attention - precisely minimization, since, of course, there will be additional charges. Zero checks are nonsense. Indeed, inspection indicators and, accordingly, employee bonuses depend on the effectiveness of inspections. Therefore, there will be additional charges, but the extent to which and, most importantly, whether you will have grounds to challenge them in court, largely depends on the quality of your actions during the tax audit.
So, you are informed that a tax audit is coming. Or the tax inspectors are already waiting in the waiting room for you to sign a decision to conduct an audit.
Rule # 1. Calm, only calm!
, , — , , — .
« »
, . , . .
, , , — .
, №2.
— , .
.
-, .
, — . — ,
.
-, , — . , . , , , , , . , , . , . — «
//», — . .
-, . . . , , . - , , , , . . , , , . . - — , , 1— , — , . , . , , . , , -...
, , , , .
?
-, , . , , . , , . . , , , . « ? , , !» — .
-, . .
-, , ó , , . , . , , , .
, , « », . , , , .
, , .
№ 2 « »
.
I
? ( ), , : , , .
, №5 , №6, , 2010-. , , . , , .
, , , ...
, , , .
, , , ( ) ...
: « . . ». , ( ) , , , .
— , , .
( « »). , ; (, , , ) .
, , , .
№ 3
, .
( ) — . ( ), 1.
, , , . , , , ... : — .
, . , .
№ 4
–
, (, ) ( — ). , ( ) «» , , . , .
( ) . , — , .
— :
) ;
) ;
) .
— ( , — ) .
№ 5
« », , ( ), .
«», . , .
, , , .
, . . . . , , .
, , , .
— , , , . , , , . , , .
, . — , , . , . , . .
№ 6
. ( , ) :
;
;
, ;
(,
);
.
( — ). . . : .
№ 7 « »
. , .
, «» , (, , -). .
— , , . , , ... , .
.
, , . , — , . , .
— , , , , , , , .
« » ( ) . : « , ?» — : « ?»
So when you start to worry, ask yourself: "Will this help?"