This article is from the cycle, you may have missed something.
This article is part of the series " Entertaining Cartography ( A Brief Introduction to Rationality) "
Why does it seem to us that reality works in a certain way? Where do the beliefs about how the phenomena around us work? Should we trust all such beliefs equally?
Where does the Map come from?
. . , , . ?
1: , . , . . , . , . . . , , . , .
. , .
2: . . .
. , . . . , .
, - , . , . - . ?
. . – . , . , ? ? . ? , ( , ), . , . . . . , , - .
, – (. UPD) . , , .
- , – .
, , . , (), – ().
« , , , . , — , » .
, ( ), . , , . ( , ), . , , , . .
– , , . , . , , . , . . .
, . , . , . , , ? .
« , — , , » .
(, , ) . . .
, - ( -) , ( , ). , , . .
– . . , . . , – .
– . , , , . , , 100% . , ? . «» , , : , .
, . , , . .
UPD: " " " ". ( , ). , , — , . , . . — , — .
Therefore, we can safely say: if the forecast of the map coincided with the territory, this is definitely an argument in favor of this map ( certificate for ). With the caveat that a number of factors influence the strength of an argument. I plan to consider these factors in a separate series of posts (there will be a link here).