In previous articles , from RSagittariusdevoted to ZeroTier, the practical application of this tool and its configuration were discussed in detail. It's time to compare it with such an increasingly popular solution as WireGuard, in order to understand in which cases it is better to choose ZeroTier, and in which WireGuard. Also, "for a snack", consider such a thing as the RuVDS LAN.
Wireguard is a relatively new popular VPN out of the box
There are many VPN solutions out there, the best known today being IPSec, WireGuard and until recently the most popular, OpenVPN. So why did I decide to compare ZeroTier, which is not positioned by the manufacturer as a classic VPN solution, with WireGuard? There are several reasons for this:
- Easy to set up - low entry threshold.
- Multiplatform - the availability of clients for all common platforms, including mobile.
- The "novelty" of the products - both have become "heard" relatively recently.
- It was interesting to compare what comes directly with the Linux kernel, modern versions (WireGuard) with ZeroTier.
So, what is WireGuard: Wireguard is a classic client-server VPN solution. Open source, fairly simple, configurable and productive. Let's go over the points from the list above.
1. Easy to set up
Compared to OpenVPN, setting up WireGuard is really "trivial". It is enough to generate public-private key pairs and exchange public keys between hosts, raise WireGuard interfaces (albeit with your hands), and communicate them with your hands. This, in principle, completes the basic setup.
and this is only for two hosts, and after all, WG also knows how to topology "star" and in mesh . Of course, in production, everything is done by creating configs in
/etc/wireguard/interface_name.conf
and adding systemd to autorun
wg-quick@interface_name.service
. Or by standard interface configuration if systemd-networkd is used. There you can also see how to configure wireguard for other network managers, including NetworkManager.
2. Multi-platform
WireGuard is doing more than good with multiplatform. Here's what we have at the moment:
- Android
- iOS
- Linux
- FreeBSD
- MacOS
- Mikrotik (RouterOS ≥7.1beta)
- NetBSD
- Openbsd
- Openwrt
- Windows
3. Novelty
WireGuard first came out at the end of June 2016 and was immediately sold to a small handful of VPN providers:
Earliest snapshots of the code base exist from June 30, 2016. Four early adopters of WireGuard were> the VPN service providers Mullvad, AzireVPN, IVPN and cryptostorm.
Wikipedia
ZeroTier - Virtual Switch with VPN and Firewall
I'll tell you right away and honestly. I have not experienced such pleasure from connecting a certain number of hosts to the network for a long time. The simplicity and consistency of operation and configuration of ZeroTier simply captivates. And taking into account the fact that RuVDS provides a ready-made template for raising your own ZeroTier controller, it also reduces the time for deploying a VPN network. In no other open source project, before that, I have not yet seen such an ease of adding individual hosts and entire local networks to a VPN network. Yes, it is the network, because the manufacturer positions its product as a virtual switch with a VPN function. Now you can go through the same points as in the case of WireGuard.
1. Easy to set up
I will not repeat myself, because everything has already been written before us . I will only note that adding a new host is one command on the view client
zerotier-cli join 7ca3bd9b52f9d96b
and ... and that's it! (well, plus check the authorization checkbox in the controller's web interface for the newly added host). Routing to LANs, for example to LANs of branches, is also no problem! Checkbox in the GUI and statics routes on local routers. In general, at least I recommend giving it a try!
2. Multi-platform
ZT also pampers with an abundance of clients for everything that moves, including almost all popular NAS and even OpenWRT.
- Android
- Docker
- iOS
- Linux
- FreeBSD
- MacOS
- Openwrt
- QNap
- Synology
- WD MyCloud NAS
- Windows
3. Novelty
ZeroTier is no longer a boy. Still, 10 years of development, by IT standards, is already something. But nevertheless, the product looks fresh, at least in concept. And most importantly, it works exactly as intended. But this is all lyrics. It seems to me it's time to move on to the most important thing to compare ...
Compare our heroes
Here we will bring together all the practical aspects of both products, plus compare the performance and decide when and for what it is better to use WireGuard, and when ZeroTier. So:
- Easy to customize. Here ZeroTier takes the lead with a significant margin. I have not seen a simpler solution.
- Multiplatform. Here ± parity. But WireGuard now has support for Mikrotik routers , which can be a decisive factor when choosing a solution.
- . ZeroTier «» (, ! , ) / VPN .
- . .
- :
iperf3 -P 5 -R
- , : Ubuntu 20.04.
- «» RuVDS + :
- CPU: 1 X Intel® Xeon® CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
- Mem 0.5Gb
- RuVDS —
iperf3
- RuVDS —
iperf3
WireGuard,
root@ruvds-9qxnx:~# iperf3 -c 10.0.0.2 -P 5 -R
Connecting to host 10.0.0.2, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 10.0.0.2 is sending
[ 5] local 10.0.0.1 port 44108 connected to 10.0.0.2 port 5201
[ 7] local 10.0.0.1 port 44110 connected to 10.0.0.2 port 5201
[ 9] local 10.0.0.1 port 44112 connected to 10.0.0.2 port 5201
[ 11] local 10.0.0.1 port 44114 connected to 10.0.0.2 port 5201
[ 13] local 10.0.0.1 port 44116 connected to 10.0.0.2 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.20 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 2.12 MBytes 17.8 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.23 MBytes 10.3 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.90 MBytes 15.9 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.86 MBytes 15.6 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 9.30 MBytes 78.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.22 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.24 MBytes 18.8 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.07 MBytes 9.01 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.17 MBytes 18.2 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 1.00-2.00 sec 2.30 MBytes 19.3 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 10.0 MBytes 84.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.07 MBytes 17.4 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.83 MBytes 23.7 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.08 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.21 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 2.00-3.00 sec 2.45 MBytes 20.6 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 89.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.06 MBytes 17.3 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.87 MBytes 24.1 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 890 KBytes 7.29 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.10 MBytes 17.6 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 3.00-4.00 sec 2.12 MBytes 17.8 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 10.0 MBytes 84.1 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.27 MBytes 19.0 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.57 MBytes 21.5 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 967 KBytes 7.92 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.07 MBytes 17.4 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 4.00-5.00 sec 2.31 MBytes 19.4 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.2 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.20 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.78 MBytes 23.3 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 5.00-6.00 sec 927 KBytes 7.60 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.11 MBytes 17.7 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 5.00-6.00 sec 2.72 MBytes 22.8 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 10.7 MBytes 89.9 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.97 MBytes 16.5 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.66 MBytes 22.3 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 6.00-7.00 sec 840 KBytes 6.88 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.22 MBytes 18.6 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 6.00-7.00 sec 2.65 MBytes 22.3 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 10.3 MBytes 86.6 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.96 MBytes 16.4 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.98 MBytes 25.0 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 7.00-8.00 sec 798 KBytes 6.53 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.89 MBytes 15.8 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 7.00-8.00 sec 2.55 MBytes 21.4 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 10.2 MBytes 85.2 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.00 MBytes 16.8 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 8.00-9.00 sec 3.05 MBytes 25.6 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 8.00-9.00 sec 826 KBytes 6.76 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.03 MBytes 17.1 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 8.00-9.00 sec 2.58 MBytes 21.6 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 87.7 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.95 MBytes 16.4 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 9.00-10.00 sec 3.16 MBytes 26.5 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 9.00-10.00 sec 827 KBytes 6.77 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.04 MBytes 17.1 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 9.00-10.00 sec 2.52 MBytes 21.1 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 10.5 MBytes 87.9 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.06 sec 22.1 MBytes 18.4 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 20.9 MBytes 17.5 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7] 0.00-10.06 sec 29.2 MBytes 24.3 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 7] 0.00-10.00 sec 27.3 MBytes 22.9 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 9] 0.00-10.06 sec 10.3 MBytes 8.58 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 9] 0.00-10.00 sec 9.31 MBytes 7.81 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 11] 0.00-10.06 sec 21.9 MBytes 18.2 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 11] 0.00-10.00 sec 20.7 MBytes 17.4 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 13] 0.00-10.06 sec 25.8 MBytes 21.5 Mbits/sec 1 sender
[ 13] 0.00-10.00 sec 24.1 MBytes 20.2 Mbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.06 sec 109 MBytes 91.0 Mbits/sec 1 sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 102 MBytes 85.8 Mbits/sec receiver
iperf Done.
ZeroTier,
root@ruvds-9qxnx:~# iperf3 -c 172.28.1.64 -P 5 -R
Connecting to host 172.28.1.64, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 172.28.1.64 is sending
[ 5] local 172.28.1.91 port 34468 connected to 172.28.1.64 port 5201
[ 7] local 172.28.1.91 port 34470 connected to 172.28.1.64 port 5201
[ 9] local 172.28.1.91 port 34472 connected to 172.28.1.64 port 5201
[ 11] local 172.28.1.91 port 34474 connected to 172.28.1.64 port 5201
[ 13] local 172.28.1.91 port 34476 connected to 172.28.1.64 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.08 MBytes 9.07 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 988 KBytes 8.08 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 768 KBytes 6.28 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 615 KBytes 5.03 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 0.00-1.00 sec 1.03 MBytes 8.65 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 4.43 MBytes 37.1 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.28 MBytes 10.8 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 1006 KBytes 8.25 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 808 KBytes 6.63 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 660 KBytes 5.41 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 1.00-2.00 sec 1.26 MBytes 10.6 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 4.96 MBytes 41.6 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.14 MBytes 9.55 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.04 MBytes 8.72 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 872 KBytes 7.14 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 437 KBytes 3.58 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 2.00-3.00 sec 1.12 MBytes 9.40 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 4.58 MBytes 38.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 625 KBytes 5.13 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 845 KBytes 6.93 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 953 KBytes 7.81 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 400 KBytes 3.28 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 3.00-4.00 sec 832 KBytes 6.82 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 3.57 MBytes 30.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 620 KBytes 5.08 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 606 KBytes 4.97 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.12 MBytes 9.37 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 633 KBytes 5.19 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 4.00-5.00 sec 1.00 MBytes 8.42 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 3.94 MBytes 33.0 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 802 KBytes 6.57 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 5.00-6.00 sec 690 KBytes 5.65 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 5.00-6.00 sec 1.53 MBytes 12.8 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 5.00-6.00 sec 920 KBytes 7.54 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 5.00-6.00 sec 955 KBytes 7.82 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 4.82 MBytes 40.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 309 KBytes 2.53 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 6.00-7.00 sec 228 KBytes 1.87 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 6.00-7.00 sec 464 KBytes 3.80 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 6.00-7.00 sec 322 KBytes 2.64 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 6.00-7.00 sec 311 KBytes 2.55 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 1.60 MBytes 13.4 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 577 KBytes 4.73 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 7.00-8.00 sec 580 KBytes 4.75 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 7.00-8.00 sec 1.30 MBytes 10.9 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 7.00-8.00 sec 792 KBytes 6.49 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 7.00-8.00 sec 655 KBytes 5.36 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 3.84 MBytes 32.2 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 781 KBytes 6.40 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 8.00-9.00 sec 561 KBytes 4.59 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.29 MBytes 10.8 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 8.00-9.00 sec 1.18 MBytes 9.87 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 8.00-9.00 sec 631 KBytes 5.17 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 4.39 MBytes 36.8 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 961 KBytes 7.87 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 9.00-10.00 sec 762 KBytes 6.24 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.44 MBytes 12.0 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 9.00-10.00 sec 1.15 MBytes 9.67 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 9.00-10.00 sec 717 KBytes 5.87 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 4.97 MBytes 41.7 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.99 sec 8.33 MBytes 6.36 Mbits/sec 33 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 8.07 MBytes 6.77 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7] 0.00-10.99 sec 7.32 MBytes 5.58 Mbits/sec 64 sender
[ 7] 0.00-10.00 sec 7.16 MBytes 6.01 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 9] 0.00-10.99 sec 10.7 MBytes 8.20 Mbits/sec 61 sender
[ 9] 0.00-10.00 sec 10.4 MBytes 8.76 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 11] 0.00-10.99 sec 7.25 MBytes 5.53 Mbits/sec 70 sender
[ 11] 0.00-10.00 sec 7.00 MBytes 5.87 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 13] 0.00-10.99 sec 8.61 MBytes 6.57 Mbits/sec 55 sender
[ 13] 0.00-10.00 sec 8.42 MBytes 7.07 Mbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.99 sec 42.3 MBytes 32.2 Mbits/sec 283 sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 41.1 MBytes 34.5 Mbits/sec receiver
Unfortunately, ZeroTier, predictably, lost in performance. At least for systems based on the Linux kernel. But, in my humble opinion, ZeroTier won in its simplicity and ease of administration. Hence the conclusion. If you need high performance between Linux servers and workstations, choose WireGuard. If you have clients, mostly on MacOS, Windows, and mobile platforms, then I would choose ZeroTier. Especially if you need to add / remove new clients, in large numbers, distribute access rights, and so on. Well, for RuVDS customers, the speed and convenience of deploying your own controller, "in one click", can be a decisive factor. Also, to simplify the choice, I will give a summary table of compatible platforms:
Now for a little surprise
In fact, for the case of connecting the servers hosted by RuVDS, there is another option. Option specified in the title of the article. And this option, in terms of performance, is even done by WireGuard, but at the same time, in terms of simplicity of configuration, it is comparable to ZeroTier. This is "Local Network" in the server control panel . Under the spoiler - where to look and how to set it all up:
A short manul, in pictures
«»(1) « »(2).
.
(1). (10.0.0.0/8; 192.168.0.0/16; 172.16.0.0/12 etc), CIDR (2). (3). (4), (5), 4 5. (6).
- … , «Deploy».
(2), (1). .
« »(1) online(2).
, . , (1). «» , (2).
.
(1). (10.0.0.0/8; 192.168.0.0/16; 172.16.0.0/12 etc), CIDR (2). (3). (4), (5), 4 5. (6).
- … , «Deploy».
(2), (1). .
« »(1) online(2).
, . , (1). «» , (2).
The most interesting thing is the performance (the servers are the same as in the WireGuard and ZeroTier tests):
$ iperf3 -c 192.168.0.3 -P 5 -R
Connecting to host 192.168.0.3, port 5201
Reverse mode, remote host 192.168.0.3 is sending
[ 5] local 192.168.0.4 port 35816 connected to 192.168.0.3 port 5201
[ 7] local 192.168.0.4 port 35818 connected to 192.168.0.3 port 5201
[ 9] local 192.168.0.4 port 35820 connected to 192.168.0.3 port 5201
[ 11] local 192.168.0.4 port 35822 connected to 192.168.0.3 port 5201
[ 13] local 192.168.0.4 port 35824 connected to 192.168.0.3 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 14.8 MBytes 124 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 0.00-1.00 sec 14.9 MBytes 125 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 0.00-1.00 sec 14.7 MBytes 123 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 0.00-1.00 sec 14.7 MBytes 123 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 0.00-1.00 sec 14.6 MBytes 122 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 0.00-1.00 sec 73.7 MBytes 617 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 20.9 MBytes 176 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 1.00-2.00 sec 20.7 MBytes 174 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 1.00-2.00 sec 20.7 MBytes 174 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 1.00-2.00 sec 20.6 MBytes 173 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 1.00-2.00 sec 20.4 MBytes 171 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 1.00-2.00 sec 103 MBytes 868 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 18.3 MBytes 153 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 2.00-3.00 sec 18.5 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 2.00-3.00 sec 18.6 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 2.00-3.00 sec 18.2 MBytes 153 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 2.00-3.00 sec 18.5 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 2.00-3.00 sec 92.0 MBytes 771 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 18.3 MBytes 154 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 3.00-4.00 sec 18.4 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 3.00-4.00 sec 18.2 MBytes 153 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 3.00-4.00 sec 18.4 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 3.00-4.00 sec 18.1 MBytes 152 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 3.00-4.00 sec 91.4 MBytes 768 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 17.0 MBytes 142 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 4.00-5.00 sec 17.2 MBytes 144 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 4.00-5.00 sec 17.0 MBytes 142 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 4.00-5.00 sec 17.4 MBytes 146 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 4.00-5.00 sec 16.7 MBytes 140 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 4.00-5.00 sec 85.3 MBytes 713 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 16.5 MBytes 139 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 5.00-6.00 sec 16.7 MBytes 141 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 5.00-6.00 sec 16.7 MBytes 140 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 5.00-6.00 sec 16.4 MBytes 138 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 5.00-6.00 sec 16.1 MBytes 136 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 5.00-6.00 sec 82.4 MBytes 694 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 17.7 MBytes 148 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 6.00-7.00 sec 17.8 MBytes 149 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 6.00-7.00 sec 17.6 MBytes 148 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 6.00-7.00 sec 17.5 MBytes 146 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 6.00-7.00 sec 17.3 MBytes 145 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 6.00-7.00 sec 87.9 MBytes 736 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 17.7 MBytes 148 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 7.00-8.00 sec 17.9 MBytes 149 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 7.00-8.00 sec 17.6 MBytes 148 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 7.00-8.00 sec 17.7 MBytes 148 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 7.00-8.00 sec 17.5 MBytes 147 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 7.00-8.00 sec 88.5 MBytes 741 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 18.7 MBytes 157 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 8.00-9.00 sec 18.8 MBytes 158 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 8.00-9.00 sec 18.9 MBytes 159 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 8.00-9.00 sec 18.7 MBytes 157 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 8.00-9.00 sec 18.5 MBytes 155 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 8.00-9.00 sec 93.6 MBytes 787 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 19.2 MBytes 161 Mbits/sec
[ 7] 9.00-10.00 sec 19.1 MBytes 160 Mbits/sec
[ 9] 9.00-10.00 sec 19.0 MBytes 160 Mbits/sec
[ 11] 9.00-10.00 sec 19.0 MBytes 160 Mbits/sec
[ 13] 9.00-10.00 sec 18.8 MBytes 158 Mbits/sec
[SUM] 9.00-10.00 sec 95.1 MBytes 799 Mbits/sec
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 181 MBytes 151 Mbits/sec 150 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 179 MBytes 150 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 7] 0.00-10.05 sec 182 MBytes 152 Mbits/sec 144 sender
[ 7] 0.00-10.00 sec 180 MBytes 151 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 9] 0.00-10.05 sec 181 MBytes 151 Mbits/sec 166 sender
[ 9] 0.00-10.00 sec 179 MBytes 150 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 11] 0.00-10.05 sec 181 MBytes 151 Mbits/sec 253 sender
[ 11] 0.00-10.00 sec 179 MBytes 150 Mbits/sec receiver
[ 13] 0.00-10.05 sec 179 MBytes 149 Mbits/sec 168 sender
[ 13] 0.00-10.00 sec 176 MBytes 148 Mbits/sec receiver
[SUM] 0.00-10.05 sec 904 MBytes 755 Mbits/sec 881 sender
[SUM] 0.00-10.00 sec 893 MBytes 749 Mbits/sec receiver
Obvious questions
1. ?
VLAN/IPsec, .
2. ?
RuVDS.
3. ?
ZeroTier.
- Wireguard — , VPN . .
- ZeroTier — , , . .
- « » RuVDS — , , Linux Windows , . .
