« - ?». , , , . , - .
. , . . : - , ? , , .
. , . , XX- .
, . 1700- 2000- , () (), , . 19- , , , . 1890 1940 , 20 , . 1970- , , .
, , : , . , .
. , , , , -. , , - , .
, , « » , , , . , -, , (1912) (1909), , .
Cosmopolitan . , : 50 ? , “ , ”. , , , . , , , .
1920- 1930- , . , , . , . , , , . « » 1929 : « , ».
-, c , . - .
, , , . , . , . .
, . , , 70- 80- . , , , .
. , 2012 81 45- 86 45- ; , 1960- , . , - . . - , . , , , .
: , ? - , , .
, , , . , , . , , , , . , , . , , , . , , , , .
. , - , . , , . , , .
, . , , , , .
:
, . , , , . , , . , , .
, , , , . , , , .
? , - , , . : , . , , .
We are already seeing changes in attitudes towards marriage that could catalyze the introduction of sexbots. A mini-revolution is taking place before our eyes, driven by the acceptance of polygamy in marriage and, more broadly, the rejection of the universal concept of marriage. Access to sex devices cannot transform society by itself, but it can accelerate and accelerate ongoing change. And for those who only see the concept of traditional marriage, there will be hard times with the spread of access to sexbots.