Most domestic startups are half-dead clones

From a series of interviews with top habrayusers

Domestic startups are unpopular due to poor thoughtfulness, cowardly investors and a lack of original ideas. Their lives are an endless drift with the flow in a vain pursuit of originals. The main qualities of the latter are search engine and social optimization specialist, blogger and Odessa resident Andrey Rogovsky not only thoughtful usability and originality of design, but even empathy of the community! Read more in this interview.


Your beloved friend, Odessky, continues a series of materials on the latest ways to communicate and inform the public. The hero of our interview, a well-known blogger, moneymaker and system administrator, Andrey Rogovsky, has his own original method for diagnosing diseases in startups and an arsenal of proven tools to combat them. At the same time, as he himself notes, those who do not expect a large cash flow from investors, but agree to go through a long and difficult path of social and search engine optimization, overcoming many pitfalls, have a chance for a cure. Ineffective managers, unskilled developers, lack of original concepts, and often the desire to develop further - a list of diseases that often make startups completely different from what they could, each time is replenished with new items.At the same time, the problems are reinforced by the fear of going beyond the usual and, as Andrei says, the conservatism of domestic investors is like a cancerous tumor. However, the hardest and most necessary decision for startup founders is to start change from themselves.

Odessky: . , , , , , , ?

: , - . , , .

. - . - , , . , , , , .

Odessky: , . , , , ?

: . , . «, , , - . – . …» . , . . , , – , , , , , .

: – , – , – , , . – , , , , , , . .

Odessky: ?

: – . . , . , – , . – , , .

Odessky: , , , , , Google AdWords .. , SEO, ?

: . , , . – , , , , , … .

, -, , - , - , . : , , , . , «» « » . , , , . « » " ". , . « » - , . , …

. «» , . , . .

Odessky: . . ?

: . , , , . , . , . , .

? , , , -, . , , , , , , … , , , – , . , «», .

Odessky: , , . , , . ?

: , , . . , , , . , , , , ? , , .

Odessky: . , . . ?

: , . . , web 2.0, . - . , , – . .

Odessky: - , , , . ?

: – . , , . - – , . : , , , . .

- «», . , , , « » , , - - . , .

- - , , , … , . , «-» , , . , , «».

, , , , , . « » « », - , . , , , , . .

«-», . «» , « ». , , , , … , , , .

Odessky: , , , -. ?

: , , – . , … . . . . . … . . , , … , , , . , .

. , , . -. , « », «» , . , , - . , « » , … , , … . - , . . .

Odessky: . ? . , , ?

: web 2.0, , , . web 2.0 – , , , . , .

, , , , , , , . . , , . , . , . . . , , .

Odessky: , ? ?

: . , , , . , . . , … , .

Odessky: , , , , . ? «» …

: , . . , – . : , – . – . , , . .

, , . , , . .

Odessky: , , . , , ?

: , , , . , – . , ( , , , ) - .

, , « » , , . - . ….

, , – . , , , , , , .

( , Google), , .

Odessky: - , . , . , , ?

: , . – . . , . , , . – . , , … . , , … - .

Odessky: , . , . . «» , ?

: , … - . , , . , – .

, , , , , . . . , . , .

I love public communication through LJ. You come to the community, openly troll, play the fool, put everyone on their ears, have fun from the heart ... And literally the very next week you notice that work has become easier, the efficiency of your work has grown by 10-12 percent at least. And colleagues are also grateful for the "stuffing".

With the help of such communication, you temper your peace of mind and good spirits, the ability to make yourself laugh at, reserve the right to laugh last. And it is with the help of such communication that I keep myself in shape, and train "on cats".




All Articles