Once again, reading the comments that there are not enough smart juniors, that there is a huge demand for middles in IT, that you will not find a senior in the daytime with fire, my back starts to burn. When someone writes about their salary in another country, adding that they have enough to live on, I take up a fire extinguisher. After all, my chair is dear to me, and in general fire safety is above all. And I think I'm not alone in this. But other people can have very expensive chairs! Therefore, let's take a look at the furniture and try to figure out how to properly share our knowledge of life, so that it really carries some useful information.
Let's analyze the situation with specific examples.
A normal specialist will always find a job
Absolutely right! As soon as his salary is reduced by a grade or two, he will be welcomed with open arms not only by galleys that earn income in the West, but also by domestic companies. Therefore, without specifying a salary, this phrase means absolutely nothing. The ceiling of its meaning is that a bad specialist cannot find a job.
A normal specialist for this qualification must know A, B, C ...
We live in an era of multistack, rapid technology change, and the growth of the legacy code base. This makes it very difficult to find personnel, especially for people who do not have a technical background. There are so many abbreviations that the probability of getting a specialist's resume in all of them decreases every year. It doesn't matter that the first angular, which still has a bunch of legacy projects, is closer to VueJS than the last angular. As well as the fact that NodeJS is used from a custom pipeline for a website developer, to high-load asynchronous servers. Dozens of "basic" libraries (which, of course, cannot be mastered in a couple of days) are not worth talking about. All the same, it is easier to select by abbreviations and signatures of functions of these abbreviations, than to understand who understands what.
, , . , !
!
. , — , . . .
, !
. . , «». , — . , . , : «», « », « ». , , « » . , , .
, , !
, . , . ! , , . — , , ECMA Script . , , . .
, !
4000$( , ). . , , . , , .
( )
. 300$ . , ( ), . , !
%-name% X000 USD/EUR
, . , , ? :
- , , , .. .
- , . .
- , . , .
- , , - .
, , , , , , .
, , (, ). , . .