Aggressive migration to Atlassian cloud or is it a vendor lock-in?

At the moment, the Cloud First model (somewhere already Smart) is striding by leaps and bounds, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. And in fact, in general, countries such as the USA ( Cloud Smart ), EU , Canada , UK , Australia , Chile , Argentina already have a strategy, goals and plans. For example, following the attached links, one gets the impression that here it is, the cloud, and that's it - it's time to have only a cloud or a hybrid. 

But I am always worried about such a situation as vendor lock-in.

My first impression was that the vendor lock-in came after the October 16 news announcement from Atlassian co-founder Scott Farquhar . As a strong-willed and unilateral decision, the following important dates are reported:

from February 2, 2021,

and from February 2, 2024:

  • Server edition support will end. 

So, this means that the vendor is forcibly trying to transfer everyone to the cloud or, at worst, to the Data Center. The company provides 3 options for installing products: 

  • Server 

  • Data Center

  • Cloud

Server , . . 

Data Center , , . 

, Cloud, , AWS . , .

, , :

  1. 2024 , DC. , DC Server .

  2. DC, , DC. ( 1 2021 (01.07.2021). , .)

  3. Cloud, 152-,   https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CLOUD-11061 . (* Atlassian )

  4. , , on-prem (Redmine, Phabricator, Youtrack, Trac, Mantis, BugGenie, Gitlab, AzureDevOps)

  5. , , . (: Github, Wrike, Asana, Smartsheet, Trello (Atlassian product)). 

, , , -

Therefore, I believe that, in principle, a rather interesting future awaits people involved in the maintenance, the development of the Atlassian ecosystem (not cloud products) in organizations, especially members of the Atlassian community on Telegram . And I will be glad to read your feedback, learn about other products (in the field of project management), solutions and opinions on these initiatives.




All Articles