Is it possible to designate the relationship in the world as something exclusively paired? When conducting research, most often only two characteristics are compared, that is, the attention of observers remains fixed only on the research criteria. Wouldn't it be fair to exclude the pretext from any research? Do all research completely blindly? The control sample is not enough control if the same epistemology should act as a criterion for research.
Humanity is obliged to conduct a control observation of experiences with a large number of outcomes that would be easily repeatable, but would not have a clear criterion. Such an experience can be a systematic extraction of sentences from the tested: sentences are the only form of reflection of reality, which is not inferior to it in the manifestation of mental identification with the desired object.
The subjects should be asked a single goal - to write a single sentence in two languages. Moreover, one should become the object of one study, and the second - another. Moreover, each must begin with words denoting probability, for example, "most likely." Further, according to a random proposal from both corpuses, it is worth sending out two parallel experiments (that is, two per person) to the participants and asking them to evaluate the reliability of the fact indicated in it in relation to the respondent.
If by increasing access to a random sample from both studies, the factual percentage does not converge, the chances that we are living in a simulated system are quite high. Obviously, the guys who do the verification don't really need to report what they are doing.