Three stories and one question

One of the criminal characters of the popular film:

We are not like that - life is like that



It happens, the company opens a new office. The old office is beautiful and in the center, but the new one is less fortunate: the chairs are more modest, the coffee machine is not the same, and, to be honest, even closer. In custom software development, they usually do not hesitate and transport teams as a whole. As you guessed, someone was out of luck, and Regina wrote to the public (the client also did not forget to inform). The client asked to postpone the move, but the management wrote a cool letter to the team: "Let's solve such issues privately and not tell the community, and even more so the client."



Somehow, another company decided to port the team to the capital. Some of them were already in Moscow, little remained to be done. Gabriel was offered to move to the capital or go free swimming. Further, a story with a public, a cool letter "let's decide privately" and a discussion in the social. networks. As a result, Gabriel was left in the provinces, as social networks decide :)



Soft story. Somehow Jacob (the author of the liba) was advised to score a dick in a review, and freeze or freeze. Next is the story with public, cool writing, etc. So, no one remembers how it ended ...



Question. Why do reasonable and adequate arguments voiced in a private conversation stop being reasonable and adequate in a public conversation? And if this is not the case, why not make them public immediately?